Legal Opinion

Budlong v. Budlong

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1903No. 4531PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Botd J. Tallman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

This action was begun in January, 1902, to set aside a certain deed to real estate on the ground of fraud, and to subject the real estate to the lien of two judgments rendered after the execution of the deed. The complaint alleges, in substance, that in Hovember, 1893, the defendant George E. Budlong was the owner in fee of lot 8 in block 71 of C. O. Terry’s Eirst Addition to Seattle, in King county; that on the 5th of December, 1894, said George E. Budlong, without consideration, and for the purpose and with the intent to deceive and defraud…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marble Savings Bank v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Budlong v. BudlongWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinsey v. DuteauWashington Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API