Sinclair Refining Co. v. Clay
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
This is an action for specific performance of a purchase option in a lease.
A Mr. Robertson leased the property in question to plaintiff Sinclair Refining Company in 1937 although he did not acquire title to the property until July 8, 1938 This lease, prepared by Sinclair, was for a ten year term and included a provision for a five year extension. In the lease Sinclair also was given a purchase option and a first refusal option. In 1943 Robertson sold the property to defendant Ada M. Clay and while it could be assumed that Sinclair at the time had been given first refusal,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Butler v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948
- Shell Oil Co. v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cummins v. DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Texaco, Inc. v. CreelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Bobali Corp. v. Tamapa Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Crowley v. Texaco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.