Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 8, 1954No. 43392PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DALTON, Judge.

Action for specific performance of a contract to sell described real estate in the City of Clayton. Plaintiffs alleged that, as assignees of a lease containing an option to the lessees to purchase the real estate, they had exercised the option and defendants had refused performance. The cause was submitted solely upon plaintiffs’ evidence and the trial court entered a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs appealed.

Neither plaintiffs nor defendants requested findings of facts or’conclusions of law and the trial court made none. Nor is there a memorandum or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rockhill Tennis Club of Kansas City v. VolkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Herzog v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  3. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Rice v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Wonderly v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Alexander A. Simon, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc., Michael W. Swofford, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Wilkinson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Bine v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Kopp v. FranksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API