Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Bigelow Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1994No. 94CA0132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Plaintiff, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Boulder, Colorado (County) commenced these proceedings against defendant, Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand & Bigelow Incorporated (Dougherty), a Minnesota investment banking firm, seeking a judgment declaring the rights of the parties with respect to an equipment lease-purchase agreement and related instruments (Agreement).

Dougherty appeals from a summary judgment entered by the district court which held that the Agreement does not violate Article X, Section 20 of the Colorado Constitution entitled “The Taxpayer’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Glennon Heights, Inc. v. Central Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. In Re Interrogatories Propounded by the Senate Concerning House Bill 1078Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Gude v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Nicholl v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Colorado Criminal Justice Reform Coalition v. OrtizColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Fixed Base Operators, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API