Legal Opinion

Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 17, 1999No. 99SA108PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey

This matter comes before us..pursuant to article VI, section 3 of the Colorado Constitution. Under authority of that provision, the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, by joint, resolution, submitted to this court three interrogatories regarding House Bill 99-1325. These are:

Interrogatory No. One

Would transportation revenue anticipation notes issued in accordance with the provisions of House Bill 99-1325 constitute a “debt by loan in any form” that is prohibited by section 3 of article XI of the state constitution?

Interrogatory No. Two

Would transportation revenue anticipation notes…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Glennon Heights, Inc. v. Central Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API