Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
This matter comes before us..pursuant to article VI, section 3 of the Colorado Constitution. Under authority of that provision, the General Assembly of the State of Colorado, by joint, resolution, submitted to this court three interrogatories regarding House Bill 99-1325. These are:
Interrogatory No. One
Would transportation revenue anticipation notes issued in accordance with the provisions of House Bill 99-1325 constitute a “debt by loan in any form” that is prohibited by section 3 of article XI of the state constitution?
Interrogatory No. Two
Would transportation revenue anticipation notes…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,614 the Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Zaner v. City of BrightonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Glennon Heights, Inc. v. Central Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- City of Golden v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Davidson v. SandstromSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.