Legal Opinion

In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-08.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 24, 2018No. SC17-1870PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases (Committee) has submitted proposed changes to the standard jury instructions and asks that the Court authorize the amended standard instructions for publication and use. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Committee proposes that the Court amend standard jury instructions 3.12 (Verdict), 3.12(a) (Single Defendant, Multiple Counts or Informations), 3.12(c) (Multiple Counts or Informations, Multiple Defendants), and 3.12(d) (Legally Interlocking Counts), and adopt new instruction 3.12(f) (Crime…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases - Report 2019-11Supreme Court of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API