Legal Opinion

Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 14, 2016No. SC12-1947PublishedCited by 549 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before the Court on remand from the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hurst v. Florida, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016) (Hurst v. Florida), following its certiorari review and reversal of our decision in Hurst v. State, 147 So.3d 435 (Fla.2014) (Hurst v. State). In that ease, we affirmed Timothy Lee Hurst’s death sentence, which was imposed after a second penalty phase sentencing proceeding. We held there, consistent with longstanding precedent, that Florida’s capital sentencing scheme was not violative of the Sixth Amendment or the United States…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by549 opinions

  1. James Ernest Hitchcock v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. John F. Mosley v. State of Florida & SC14-2108 John F. Mosley v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  5. Bessman Okafor v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017

544 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API