Legal Opinion

United States v. McKee

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 20, 1976No. CM 434432PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*982OPINION OF THE COURT

DRIBBEN, Judge:

Pursuant to his plea of guilty before a general court-martial consisting of a military judge alone, appellant was found guilty of wrongful possession and wrongful sale of amphetamines in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. He was sentenced as noted in the approved sentence above.

Before this Court, as well as at trial level, appellant asserts that the trial counsel was disqualified from representing the Government because he had previously acted as counsel for appellant in the same case.

The record of trial reveals that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. StringerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. RushatzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. FowlerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. DiazU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. HustwitU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. WheelerArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API