Legal Opinion
Queenan v. Mays
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1937No. 1423, 1424PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Appeal of the Receiver — No. 1423.
The administrator has moved to dismiss this appeal because the decree ran against the bank as well as the receiver, the bank did not join in the petition for appeal and there was no summons and severance. The bank is hopelessly insolvent; the controversy is solely over distribution of assets in the hands of the receiver; the bank is a formal party only; the judgment against it was a meaningless gesture; throughout the proceedings the same counsel have represented both the bank and the receiver. The omission of the bank’s…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Texas Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Huddleston v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- L. N. Childress and Roger W. Crampton v. E. A. Cook, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Leonard v. GageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- Collier v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- J. P. (Bum) Gibbins, Inc. v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.