Legal Opinion
Grinnell Co. v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 27, 1945No. 8694PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, circuit judge.
Grinnell Company, Inc., brought suit against Anthony P. Miller, Inc., a building firm, and Miller, its President, appellees herein, for a balance due on an account for certain plumbing materials, ordered from the Grinnell Company by Harry Hurowitz, a sub-contractor, and furnished to a job on which the Miller Company was general contractor.
Appellant based its claim against Miller and the Miller Company on the following grounds: (1) That they signed a written contract agreeing to pay Grinnell for the plumbing materials; (2) that Hurowitz was the agent for the Miller…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- A. B. Small Co. v. Lamborn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Farr Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FARMERS'CO-OP. UNIONCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paramount Pictures, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases). Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Rodney, U.S. District Judge (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Giblin v. BeelerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Renault v. L. N. Renault & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Frances H. Giblin, and Cross-Appellee v. Robert Beeler, Wilma Beeler and Juliette Beeler, and Cross-Appellants v. Floyd Lampert and First National Bank of Beloit, Kansas, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968