Legal Opinion

Yumul v. Smart Balance, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 30, 2010No. Case CV 10-00927 MMM (AJWx)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Rebecca Yumul filed this putative class action against defendant Smart Balance, Inc. on February 8, 2010. 1 Yumul’s complaint alleges that she purchased Nucoa margarine, a product manufactured by Smart Balance, repeatedly during the class period, from January 1, 2000 until the present. 2

Yumul alleges that Nucoa contains artificial trans fat, which increases the risk of coronary heart disease by raising the level of “bad” LDL blood cholesterol and lowering the level of “good”…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Asghari v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
  4. Eidson v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API