Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 27, 2003No. 20936-9-IIIPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Pretextual stops are prohibited by our state constitution. State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 353, 979 P.2d 833 (1999). They generally take the form of police stopping a driver for a minor traffic offense to investigate *95more serious violations — violations for which the officer does not have probable cause. Here, a deputy sheriff suspected that Eugene R. Myers was driving with a suspended license. He called for a license check and started to tail the car. When the report did not come back, he stopped Mr. Myers for a couple of minor traffic violations — failures to signal when changing lanes.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API