Legal Opinion

State v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1946No. 34,128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

These appeals raise the single question whether the evidence in each case is sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant Wilson was convicted of keeping “a disorderly and ill-governed tippling house” in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis which, so far as it relates to the offense of keeping, is set forth in State v. Siporen, 215 Minn. 438, 10 N. W. (2d) 353. The other defendants were convicted of being found in a tippling house in violation of the same ordinance.

No provision of the ordinance defining a tippling house has been called to our attention.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Chappell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. SiporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Calhoun v. BellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. City of Saint Paul v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. City of St. Paul v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API