Legal Opinion

City of St. Paul v. Page

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1969No. 41360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for operating a disorderly house in violation of St. Paul Legislative Code, § 469.01, which provides as follows:

“Any person or persons who shall within the limits of the City of St. Paul, keep a house of ill-fame, or a place resorted to for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness, or who shall keep a disorderly or ill-governed house or place, or a house or place for the practice of fornication, or for the resort of persons of evil name or fame, or dishonest conversation, or who shall permit or suffer to come together, at such houses or place,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. PaulickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of St. Paul v. WhidbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. City of Saint Paul v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. In Re Welfare of SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API