Legal Opinion

Schecter v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 20, 1990No. 00014PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of appellees and against appellant after denial of post-trial motions.

Appellant raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees a compulsory non-suit on appellant’s breach of contract action and denied his points for charge; (2) whether the trial court erred in refusing certain points for charge regarding appellant’s “freeze-out” claim in favor of its own instructions; (3) whether the trial court erred in prohibiting appellant from presenting testimony that he…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Dorn v. Stanhope Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Holland v. ZelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Coyne v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Chanthavong v. TranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Ruffing v. 84 Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Smith v. GrabSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API