Milton Education & Support Ass'n v. Milton Board of School Trustees
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, J.
For twenty years, Vermont law has consistently required a union’s waiver of statutory bargaining rights to be “conscious and explicit.” Relying on this precedent, the Vermont Labor Relations Board concluded that the union had not waived its statutory bargaining rights on subcontracting because the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement does not consciously and explicitly waive this right. Today, the majority abandons the conscious-and-explicit-waiver rule and concludes that the collective-bargaining agreement, completely silent on subcontracting, presents an issue of contract…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- John A. Russell Corp. v. BohligSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Furniture Rentors of America, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.