Legal Opinion
In Re Hadzi-Antich
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 9, 1985No. 85-52PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (BPR) found that respondent, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, violated Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) by “engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation” and recommended that he be publicly censured. Briefly stated, the evidence showed that respondent submitted a resume to a prospective employer, Southern Methodist University School of Law, which contained false information. He was hired as an Assistant Professor of Law but resigned after being confronted with the falsehoods…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re LamberisIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against LaveryWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In re NorwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re AbramsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.