Legal Opinion
State v. Carver
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 26, 1974No. 103PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Justice.
[t] Defendant contends that the trial judge erred by allowing the solicitor to cross-examine defendant concerning his. failure to subpoena certain witnesses.
In this connection, the record discloses the following exchange between the solicitor and defendant:
“Q. Did you ever make any effort to find any witnesses who could verify your side of the case other than these two gentlemen you have brought into court?
Objection Overruled.
Exception.
“A. Yes, sir. I contacted Roy Paylor and William Pointer, the man that told Leon [the deceased] to go home.
“Q. Did you subpoena them to come to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.