State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant assigns as error various instances of alleged misconduct on the part of the district attorney, contending his actions and statements in questioning witnesses, addressing the court, and in his argument to the jury deprived defendant of a fair and impartial trial guaranteed by both federal and state constitutions. This assignment requires an examination of the challenged acts and the context in which they occurred.
Defendant testified that he was at Mauney’s Supermarket and its environs from midnight until 2 a.m. on the night of 8 February 1975, talking to and riding…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. BrockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.