State v. McPherson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The defendants argue here they are entitled to have the decision of the Court of Appeals reversed and a new trial awarded because of three alleged prejudicial errors committed during the trial: (1) The failure of the trial judge to sustain objection to the evidence of Alvin Fisher identifying them as the three men who robbed him on the night of April 4, 1969; (2) The prejudicial remarks made by the judge in the presence of the jury; and (3) The refusal of the judge to permit counsel for the defendants to insert in the record the answer to a question which the court, on State’s objection, had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.