United States v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
Reference is made to the opinion filed' in the above entitled cause on June 30, 1954, 214 F.2d 389.
The government petitions for a rehearing. It claims that this court has-turned its back on its own case of Gil-*249man v. United States, 9 Cir., 206 F.2d 846, which was affirmed, 347 U.S. 507, 74 S.Ct. 695.
In the Gilman case, the United States had to respond with money damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U. S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. for the negligence of its employee. The United States then sought to recoup its loss from the employee, Gilman. There, of course,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. State Of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954