Legal Opinion
United States v. State Of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1954No. 13722_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
216 F.2d 248
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
STATE of ARIZONA, a public body, Major General A. M.
Tuthill, the Adjutant General, constituting the Arizona
National Guard, and Thomas L. Kimball, Director, and Dr. W.
J. Richards, Fred Faver and Jack Mantle, members of and
constituting the Arizona Game and Fish Commission, Appellees.
No. 13722.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 18, 1954.
Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Jack D. H. Hays, U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Arizona, Paul A. Sweeney, Morton Hollander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Ross…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blockston v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968