Legal Opinion
Stephen v. Hoerle
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 12, 1995No. 13174PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This is an action for damages arising from an automobile accident. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants negligently caused her to suffer serious injuries, including the exacerbation of preexisting agoraphobia.
The defendants noticed the plaintiffs deposition to be taken on July 19,1993, at the office of the defendants’ attorney in Bridgeport. The plaintiff filed a motion for a protective order, claiming that her agoraphobia prevented her from traveling to Bridgeport and constituted good cause, pursuant to Practice Book § 221, for relocating the deposition to her home town of Newtown. On…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lamberti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jaconski v. AMF, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Tiber Holding Corp. v. GreenbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Altberg v. Paul Kovacs Tire Shop, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Misata v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Talit v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Cadle Co. v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.