Legal Opinion
Paul v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 7, 1990No. Cong. Ref. No. 2-88PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT OF THE REVIEW PANEL
TURNER, Judge.
The review panel, consisting of Judges James T. Turner, Bohdan A. Futey and Roger B. Andewelt, duly appointed by order dated December 28, 1988,1 hereby submits its report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2509(d) and RUSCC Appendix D, 1110.2
I
This matter was referred to the court by Senate Resolution 187 (100th Cong.) for a report concerning plaintiff’s claim for legal services performed between January 1, 1966 and December 18, 1971 on behalf of Alaskan Eskimos “in connection with the enactment of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971.” Consistent with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Spalding & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Banfi Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Cordova v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.