Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
Naporano Iron and Metal Company, Andrew J. Naporano and Beatrice Naporano, Andrew J. Naporano and Sharon Naporano appeal the judgment of the United States Claims Court, No. 440-79T (November 21, 1986), denying their petition for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(A), (2)(B) (Supp. Ill 1985), on the grounds that the government’s position was substantially justified and the fee application was inadequately supported. We affirm.
We agree with Judge Tidwell’s thorough analysis of the lack of itemization in the documents…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bobby Darnell White v. City of Richmond, Henry L. Royal v. City of Richmond, Anthony Evans v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
3Cited by71 opinions
- Preseault V. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Gruber ex rel. Gruber v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Joan Caves v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Community Heating & Plumbing Company, Inc. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.