Legal Opinion

Gogel v. Bayer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1949No. Appeal, 247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment entered on a verdict in an action in trespass. The only question presented is whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. The court below refused, on defendant’s motion, to enter judgment n. o. v.

The action arose out of an accident which occurred about 7:40 p.m. on April 12, 1947, at the intersection of Twenty-second Street and Oregon Avenue in the City of Philadelphia, and in which the automobile of plaintiff and the automobile of defendant were involved.

The oral testimony as to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steffenson v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Steckler v. LutySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Goddard v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Noyes v. SternfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. National Chair Co., Inc. v. BarrallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Mor Heat Oil & Equip. Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Halbach v. Robinson Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Evans v. AlexanderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API