Coventry v. Keith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
This is an appeal from an order of the court below entering judgment n.o.v. after a verdict for the plaintiff in a trespass arising out of an automobile collision. We must view the testimony in the light most ad*506vantageous to the party having the verdict, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference of fact arising therefrom: Miller v. Hickey, 368 Pa. 317, 81 A. 2d 910.
The collision in question occurred at seven o’clock p.m. on August 6, 1951. It was daylight, and the weather was clear. Appellant was proceeding north on Forrest Avenue in the City of Philadelphia,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miller v. HickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Alperdt Et Ux. v. PaigeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Black v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Weinberg v. PavittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Cardone v. Sheldon Hotel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stewart v. Supplee-Wills-Jones Milk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Smith v. Sheraden BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Furia v. PerriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Weigel v. KravitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Coventry v. KeithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.