Legal Opinion

Steckler v. Luty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1934No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

Plaintiff, Lena Steckler, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The defendant, Luty, sued out a writ of scire facias to bring the additional defendant, Lawrence Steckler, on the record as solely liable for the accident. A verdict was returned against both defendants, and from the entry of judgment thereon Luty appealed.

On the morning of June 26, 1932, plaintiff, a guest in a car driven by her son, Lawrence Steckler, was going southward toward Portersville on State Highway No. 19, better known as the Perry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. KlemmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Dougherty v. Merchants Baking CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Aud. Gen.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Spector v. Northwestern Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guthrie's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Dayen Et Vir v. Penn Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Goddard v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Gruskin v. StittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API