Duncan v. Roy
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.*
Appealing from the district court’s order denying that mandamus is an appropriate remedy for appellant’s dispute, appellant asserts his entitlement for this relief on his claim that the commissioner of corrections failed to formulate or administer “workable” supervision conditions that are “not impossible to satisfy.” Because the appeal challenges the commissioner’s exercise of discretion, we affirm the district court.
FACTS
Appellant Demetris Duncan was sentenced in 2001 in Stearns County to 196 months’ imprisonment for first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. PeroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Coyle v. City of DelanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.