Matthews v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
The case comes before the court on two motions. First, the defendant moves for summary judgment.1 Second, the plaintiff moves to compel the defendant’s payment of fees and expenses incurred in the defendant taking the deposition of plaintiffs expert witness. Plaintiff, Anthony L. Matthews, brings this Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) action against defendant, the United States of America, for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment with Day & Zimmerman Co., Inc. Defendant seeks summary judgment arguing it is a statutory employer to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Pizza Management, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1990
- Hanna v. CRA, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mahaffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Oneida, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Guess v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997