Legal Opinion
Guess v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 23, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-2307-KHVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 36) filed March 10, 1997. Plaintiff brings this action to recover for personal injuries sustained during his employment with Intown Properties, Inc. (“In-town”) a property management company which contracted with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) to manage and operate multifamily housing properties in the Kansas City area. For the following reasons the Court *1432finds that defendant’s motion must be sustained.
Summary Judgment Standards
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Conaway v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.