Legal Opinion
In Re Quinn
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1973No. Crim. 1598PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOY, J. *
Facts
On July 25, 1971, petitioners John Emmett Quinn and Thomas and Richard Quimette were fishing in the waters of the California Aqueduct from the Cadet Road bridge in Kern County. The bridge, which is without a sidewalk or other provision for pedestrians, is owned and maintained by the County of Kern. Erected on the bridge was a clearly visible sign which read “No Fishing or Loitering from Bridge.” They were cited by Kern County Sheriff’s deputies for violation of Kern County Ordinance No. 2605, which prohibits loitering or fishing on bridges in Kern County. 1
Also on July…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Porten v. University of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.