In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
More than four years have passed since law enforcement authorities on two continents executed raids of some of the world’s largest manufacturers of flexible polyurethane foam, on suspicion that some or all of the raided firms were active in a price-fixing conspiracy. Details of the search warrant and affidavit used in" the United States raids became known after an inadvertent public filing on a federal court docket.
Dozens of lawsuits followed, filed by direct arid indirect purchasers of foam products,…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Pidcock v. SchwabDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Phhhoto Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- A.C. v. Red Roof Inns IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Doe S.W. v. Lorain-Elyria Motel, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.