Legal Opinion

In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 9, 2015No. Case No. 1:10 MD 2196PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JACK ZOUHARY, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

More than four years have passed since law enforcement authorities on two continents executed raids of some of the world’s largest manufacturers of flexible polyurethane foam, on suspicion that some or all of the raided firms were active in a price-fixing conspiracy. Details of the search warrant and affidavit used in" the United States raids became known after an inadvertent public filing on a federal court docket.

Dozens of lawsuits followed, filed by direct arid indirect purchasers of foam products,…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re: Domestic Drywall Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Pidcock v. SchwabDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
  3. Phhhoto Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
  4. A.C. v. Red Roof Inns IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Doe S.W. v. Lorain-Elyria Motel, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API