Legal Opinion

United States v. Hagberg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2005No. 04-10275PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

1. There was sufficient evidence to convict Hagberg of sending threatening letters. The jury instructions were adequate, as no specific intent to injure the victims was required to convict. See Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life Activists, 290 F.3d 1058, 1076 n. 9 (9th Cir.2002) (en banc). Defendant’s conviction did not violate the First Amendment because threats are not protected under the Constitution. See Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 707, 89 S.Ct. 1399, 22 L.Ed.2d 664 (1969).

2. We have no jurisdiction to review the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Watts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. Patrick InnieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Robert David Linn, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. American Coalition of Life ActivistsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Martece PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Martece PuckettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API