Legal Opinion
FDL Technologies, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 28, 1992No. 90-3948CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
FACTS
On September 3, 1991, plaintiffs FDL Technologies, Inc. (“FDL”), and Dale C. Nathan (“Nathan”) filed an application for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (the “EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (1988). Defendant requests that the court deny the application, contending: Plaintiffs are not a prevailing party; defendant was substantially justified in its litigation position; and plaintiffs failed to conform to RUSCC 81(e)(1), which requires that a plaintiff, in *486accordance with section 2412(d)(1)(B), submit an application…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Fidelity Construction Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Gavette v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Manno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Gutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Massie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999