Legal Opinion

Harms v. Oak Meadows

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 30, 2000No. CX-00-298Published

1Opinion of the Court

619 N.W.2d 201 (2000)

Donna M. HARMS, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

OAK MEADOWS, Respondent,

Commissioner of Economic Security, Respondent.

No. CX-00-298.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

November 30, 2000.

Peter B. Knapp, William Mitchell Law Clinic, St. Paul, for appellant.

Empire Executive Coaches, Inc. St. Paul, respondent/employer—Pro Se.

Kent E. Todd, Minn. Dept. of Econ. Sec., St. Paul, for Respondent-Commissioner.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

Petitioner, Donna M. Harms, sought review by the court of appeals of the Commissioner of Economic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kellar v. Von HoltumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Koehnen v. DufuorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Harms v. Oak MeadowsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appealCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Gonsior v. Alternative Staffing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API