Legal Opinion
Gates v. Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1995No. Nos. 94-15259, 94-15884PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
This case originated as a civfl rights class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 29 U.S.C. § 794 challenging medical care, psychiatric care, and conditions of confinement at the California Medical Facility and Main Northern Reception Center (“CMF”) in Vacaville, California.1 The suit also challenged the care and confinement of a subclass of HIV-infected inmates. The case went to trial in September, 1989. After plaintiffs rested their case, settlement negotiations culminated in a consent decree which was approved March 8,1990. The operation of the consent decree has thus far…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gates v. RowlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- James Haynes Camarillo v. Daniel J. McCarthy DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Vertex Distributing, Inc. v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., Falcon Manufacturing of California, Inc., James Allen, and Michael AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Schmidt v. JohnstoneDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Robert McGRATH, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF NEVADA; And Bill Heafey, Sheriff, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jeff D. Ex Rel. Belodoff v. OtterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.