Danekas v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, J.
N. Arden Danekas appeals from an order denying his petition for writ of mandate, brought against the San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board (Rent Board) to overturn section 6.15A of the Rent Board’s rules and regulations (hereafter section 6.15A). Section 6.15A implements Ordinance No. 237-99, passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, governing the circumstances under which a landlord can evict a tenant who replaces a departing cotenant, in violation of a lease clause prohibiting sublet and assignment. On appeal, Danekas renews a host of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Autowest, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Chacon v. LitkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rental Housing Assn. of Northern Alameda County v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Plotkin v. SAJAHTERA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Foster v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.