Legal Opinion

Armour v. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1989No. 15669PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs sought to recover on an insurance contract because of damage to the residence of plaintiffs Armour caused by a tornado. Defendant denied that the insurance policy was in effect at the time of the tornado. Following nonjury trial judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs for $24,-000, interest and costs. Defendant appeals.

The residence was damaged by a tornado on May 15, 1986. Plaintiff Colonial Federal Savings and Loan Association held a deed of trust on the residence and was a loss payee on the policy. The Armours purchased the residence in April of 1979. They…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Mitchell v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Grassham v. Farm Bureau Town & Country Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Lake v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Wojtkowski v. Shelter Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hangley v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Farley v. St. Charles Insurance Agency, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Walters Auto Body Shop, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Hennessey v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. St. Louis Trimming, Inc. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API