Legal Opinion

Farley v. St. Charles Insurance Agency, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1991No. 58188PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiffs, Larry Farley and Ethel Farley, husband and wife, seek a declaration that the loss of their home by fire is covered by a homeowners insurance policy obtained from defendants, St. Charles Insurance Agency, Inc. (St. Charles) and Fireman’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey (Fireman’s). Defendants counter with the affirmative defense of fraud. The trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ joint motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Once again, we are faced with an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Air Shields, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Miller v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  3. Block v. BlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Matlock ex rel. Matlock v. HollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Weekly v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Lake of Ozarks v. First Marine InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. TIG Ins. Co. v. Reliable Research Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2002
  3. CM Vantage Specialty Insurance Company v. Nephrite Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  4. Roslyn T. Barnes v. Athene Annuity & Life Assurance Company f/k/a Liberty Life Insurance f/k/a Business Men's Assurance Company of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API