Legal Opinion

Braceland v. Hughes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1957No. Appeal, No. 144PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff, a duly authorized agent of Bankers Mutual Fire Insurance Corporation issued a policy in that company to the defendants as of December 28, 1952. The policy as delivered to the defendants, insured their automobiles and other property for one year against loss from collision, fire and theft. There was also comprehensive insurance coverage in other respects. For failure of defendants to pay the premium of $3,096.28 plaintiff canceled the policy on June 7, 1953. Plaintiff had accounted to his company for the premium and this action was brought by him to recover the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gougher v. HanslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Brenner v. LesherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Easton School District v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Whitfield v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Geiger v. SchneyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Blackmon v. Estate of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. Hachick v. KobelakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Bata v. Central Penn National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API