Legal Opinion

Hachick v. Kobelak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1978No. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) refusing to admit into evidence the allegations contained in appellee’s original complaint and (2) holding that the dead man’s statute prevented appellant from testifying at trial. We agree that the lower court improperly refused to admit into evidence the allegations in appellee’s original complaint. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

On November 19, 1973, appellee and her husband, the decedent’s parents, administrators of the decedent’s estate, 1 filed a complaint in trespass for wrongful death 2 and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Tops Apparel Manufacturing Co. v. RothmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Blackmon v. Estate of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  4. Pitts v. Port East Pulaski HighwaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Reichman v. WallachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API