Legal Opinion
Hanson v. Christensen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 28, 1966No. 40101, 40173PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
The present appeal involves an action for damages due to personal injuries brought by Hazel M. Hanson as mother and natural guardian of Richard Hanson, a minor, and as special administratrix of the estate of the minor’s father, Arthur Hanson, deceased, against C. J. Christensen, d.b.a. The Harbor Resort. At a first trial of this action, the trial court at the close of plaintiffs’ case directed a verdict for defendant. Subsequently the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. At the *207second trial, the jury returned separate verdicts in favor of Richard Hanson in…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- J. G. Christopher Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- McLaughlin v. Rova Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Thomas J. Jones, a Single Man v. Halekulani Hotel, Inc., a Hawaiian Corporation, John Doe and the Xyz Corp., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- MacK v. McGrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Olmanson v. LeSueur CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.