Legal Opinion

Corey v. Long

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 17, 1943No. 15,298PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Young

This cause is before us on writ of error to review ■a judgment of the district court of Mesa county quieting the title of defendants to a certain water right as against any claim of plaintiff, and enjoining the latter from interfering with defendants’ use thereof. The parties are here in the order of their appearance in the district court and they will be designated herein as there, that is, as plaintiff and defendants, or by name.

Plaintiff, and defendants Long and Jones, are users of water from a natural stream known as Big Creek, under appropriation made by their immediate, or remote…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. City of Denver v. Colorado Land & Livestock Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. New Brantner Extension Ditch Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Dry Creek No. 2 Ditch Co. v. Coal Ridge Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. Fluke v. FordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Catlin Canal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Lengel v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Granby Ditch & Reservoir Co. v. HallenbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Pouchoulou v. HeathSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Graeser v. HaiglerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API