Legal Opinion

Pouchoulou v. Heath

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 9, 1958No. 18181PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Plaintiffs in error will be designated as plaintiffs and defendants in error will be referred to as defendants, the positions they occupied respectively in the trial court.

This action concerns the right of defendants to take water out of Alder Creek in San Miguel County, Colorado. The main issue tried and determined by the trial court was whether defendants had abandoned their decreed water right to water out of Alder Creek.

The trial court found from the evidence that plaintiffs failed to show abandonment “either in continued nonuse or intent to abandon.” The trial court found further: “That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. RoupSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  2. Cline v. McDowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Corey v. LongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Means v. PrattSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Lengel v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Water Rights of Orr v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Austin v. KochSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Austin v. KochSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API