New Brantner Extension Ditch Co. v. Kramer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Denver District Court. — Hon, H. C. Biddle, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
A general demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained. The plaintiff elected to stand upon this complaint and brings the case here for review. The complaint is voluminous. In substance, it sets forth the history of a certain irrigation canal, including its enlargements and extension by the predecessors of the plaintiff, under a contract with certain of the defendants, and the heirs, grantors, etc., of others, who were the former owners of the canal. It is alleged that under this contract the possession and use of the canal in perpetuity was conveyed and turned over to the predecessors of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Gardner v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Bowman v. BowmanOregon Supreme Court · 1899
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Greeley and Loveland Irrigation Co. v. McCloughanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Nahring v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Hinkle v. BlinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Van Gundy v. Van GundyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Corey v. LongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.