Legal Opinion

City of Denver v. Colorado Land & Livestock Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 17, 1929No. 12,057PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiff in error is hereinafter referred to as “the city” or “the plaintiff,” and defendants in error as “the defendants. ’ ’

The city has a decreed priority, as of date 1860, for certain water for power and irrigation purposes. This is diverted from the South Platte river through the head-gate of the Bough and Beady ditch, located near Little-ton, the county seat of Arapahoe county. It brought this action under sections 1706 and 1707, C. L. 1921, for a decree moving the diversion point of 14.1 second feet of its power appropriation and .27 second feet of its irrigation appropriation several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Minnesota Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. Farmers' High Line & Reservoir Co. v. WolfColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Cache La Poudre Reservoir Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co. v. City of GoldenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. L.U. Cattle Co. v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  4. Flasche v. Westcolo Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  5. Corey v. LongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API