Lloyd v. California Pictures Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
On September 10,1945, a contract was entered into between the Lloyd Corporation, plaintiff’s assignor, and the defendant California Pictures, for the services of Harold Lloyd in a photoplay later known as “Mad Wednesday.” On the same day, in connection therewith, Harold Lloyd contracted with Lloyd Corporation to furnish to California Pictures “artistic and stellar services,” the agreement provided that plaintiff must “receive star billing and screen credit, advertising credit, and publicity credit as star” of the photoplay.
According to plaintiff’s complaint, California Pictures agreed with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Edmonds v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Kauffman v. Bobo & WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Roberts v. WachterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- San Juan Gold Co. v. San Juan Ridge Mutual Water Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Golden v. DunganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Griffith v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shaeffer v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hoffman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.