Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1993No. B048538PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, J.

In this case, we conclude that property owners are not entitled to recover under an “all risk” homeowners policy indemnifying them against damage to their property unless there is some manifestation of physical damage to the property during the policy period. Since there was no such manifestation during the policy period in this case (which extended until the sale of the subject property), there was no covered loss. Because of our resolution of this issue, we do not reach other issues tendered by the parties concerning the efficient proximate cause of damage the property is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Lance Camper Manufacturing Corp. v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API