Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Wachter
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1951No. Civ. 17876PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrapeau, J.
By the instant action, plaintiff seeks a declaration of the rights of the parties, and recovery of damages (1) against defendant Drudis for breach of trust; and (2) against defendants Wachter and Douglass for having induced such breach.
It is a so-called companion case to Roberts v. Wachter, Civil No. 17864, this day decided, ante, p. 271 [231 P.2d 534], Both actions are based upon the same agreements. The first is to recover money due thereunder for the year 1945, while the instant action covers a period subsequent to January 1, 1946.
Demurrers were sustained to plaintiff’s amended complaints…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hardy v. San Fernando Valley Chamber of CommerceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Freed v. Manchester Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gonzales v. Interinsurance Exchange of Automobile ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Commercial Standard Insurance v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Shaeffer v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.